Storage

shared this on April 9th 2010 under Tags: , ,

I have been collecting media for a number of years, some of it dating back to 1996 or earlier.  Keeping track of all of this media, while always a headache, was easier in the past due to my primary machine being a self-built windows/linux running behemoth.  I still have a behemoth of a machine, but I have found that as I have gotten older and as technology has gotten more mature, I no longer rely upon my desktop machine as much.  It still works well for sharing data, but with each new iteration of Windows the process becomes increasingly more annoying and following a hardware/software issue a few years ago, I moved to a regime of housing my data on external units.

I moved to external units as I didn’t want my data to be locked to one machine and it worked well for a while, but now I am realizing the pitfalls of this setup as well.  Following that unfortunate incident in ’05, I purchased my first Mac and took my first steps towards moving towards a mac-based ecology.  Now I am plagued with several units, mostly based on IEEE-1394a (firewire 400), and no permanent home for them due to a split household.  While I technically due have a G4 mini that could serve the task, I would prefer a more independent solution which has lead me to look into network attached storage (NAS) based solutions.

At one point in time NAS was really only a solution for enterprise and small businesses, but with an increase in consumer data consumption/hoarding – and lower component cost – companies have begun to offer more affordable options for consumers like me.  While there are a number of options available, including some for consumer level network suppliers such as D-Link and Linksys, I have found myself being drawn to the products from a company by the name of Synology.  At first I was drawn to the DS410, as I wanted to hold a maximum number of drives at a reasonable price.  The DS410 can handle up to four 3.5″ or 2.5″ hard drives and offers 2 USB and one eSATA port.  All of their models function as DLNA/UPnP media servers and offer php-based webhosting and ftp services, as do most decent NAS units, but I am more interested in the ability to add more storage without adding more units to the network.

With this requirement in mind, I began looking at the DS710+ and DS1010+.  Both support expansion via the DX510, a unit offering an additional 5 storage bays for future expansion, and it integrates with the base unit as if the additional five bays where natively included with the base unit (so 7 bays for the DS710+ and 10 bays for the DS1010+).   If you’ll recall, I stated that most models include eSATA and USB ports that should support expansion, but I wanted expansion that I new I could rely on.  Now I am left with the decision of the DS710+ or Ds1010+, a price difference of $469 plus an additional $405 in additional hardware to populate all the bays with 2 TB Hitachi Deskstar HD32000 drives (all prices based on Newegg.com).

Below you can find a video put together by Synology highlighting some of the features of their unit.  As soon as I decide which unit to go with, I’ll post an update on setup and performance.

Synology

Leave a Reply