IBM Continues their forward march in bringing about the end of an era, one that began in the 1960s at Bell Laboratories where the first transistor was made. Oddly enough, what began with germanium quickly transitioned to silicon and the semiconductor industry that we know of today. Though there are patents for transistors dating back to the early 1920s, it wasn’t until Shockley’s work, expanding on that of Bardeen and Brattain, that we came to have the transistors that we know and love today. But it seems that all of that may soon be coming to an end, with the rapid research taking place in the fields of plasmonics and especially graphene.
We all want faster, more efficient, machines but we are starting to reach the limits of what can be done with silicon and silicon based electronics. Replacements are being research, such as the PlasMOStor DOI: 10.1021/nl803868k suggested by Henry Atwater, but it would be nice to have alternatives that offer more of a drop-in replacement for the infrastructure we currently have. That is where graphene comes in. Graphene, for those of you wondering, is a single layer of graphite – the stuff in pencils – and has become one of the latest buzzwords in the field. A better description graphene is offered by A. K. Geim et. al.
Graphene is a flat monolayer of carbon atoms tightly packed into a two-dimensional (2D) honeycomb lattice, and is a basic building block for graphitic materials of all other dimensionalities. It can be wrapped up into 0D fullerenes, rolled into 1D nanotubes or stacked into 3D graphite.[1]
And now IBM has managed to demonstrate a 100GHz transistor fashioned from this same material. If memory serves, that is about 10x faster than the fastest silicon transistor to be demonstrated. We are still a ways off from having graphene based CPUs, GPUs and APUs, but they are coming and with the blistering rate at which IBM has been moving I would say they’ll be here sooner than any of us expects.
- Geim, A. K. and Novoselov, K. S. (2007). “The rise of graphene”. Nature Materials 6 (3): 183–191. doi:10.1038/nmat1849. http://onnes.ph.man.ac.uk/nano/Publications/Naturemat_2007Review.pdf.
